현재 위치

  1. 게시판
  2. 상품 Q&A

상품 Q&A

상품 Q&A입니다.

불타는애정 - 뼈를 읽는 시간
제목 불타는애정 - 뼈를 읽는 시간
작성자 이아정 (ip:)
  • 작성일 2015-05-19 16:47:13
  • 추천 추천 하기
  • 조회수 3
  • 평점 0점
불타는애정 - 뼈를 읽는 시간
제 무게를 못이기고
가을 담벼락에
등을 기댄 나무 한 그루가
휘청, 무릎을 꿇고
감춰놓은 뼈를 드러내는 순간
나를 안아주던
당신의 팔이 생각이 났다
나를 업어주던
당신의 등이 생각이 났다
저 나무를 그토록 오래 지나치면서
어떻게 꽃이나 열매만 바라보았던 것일까
저 나무에 그토록 오래 붙어있으면서
어찌 잎이나 껍질만 만져보았던 것일까
여기 찢기고 베이고 잘린
뼈가 있다
아니다 스스로 찢고 베고 자른
뼈다
상처 가득한 뼈에서
꽃이 피고 열매가 난다
그러니 상처를 내서
그 속을 열어 뼈를 읽어라
열매 한 알 같은 가을은
당신의 아버지와 당신의 어머니가
뼈에 새긴 일대기를
낱낱이 찾아 읽는 시간이다
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
첨부파일
비밀번호 삭제하려면 비밀번호를 입력하세요.

목록

삭제 수정 답변

  • Winstonberb 2015-05-20 19:12:54 0점 댓글 수정 댓글 삭제 스팸글 There's no point mincing terms:[url=http://www.prmconcrete.com/c-4_11.html]ケブル整理ボックス[/url] This was a certainly weird Paul Smith demonstrate. Sir Paul seemed for taking a "see what sticks" way of his womenswear this year, throwing a plethora of ideas with the figurative wall. The ideas themselves bore no self-evident relationship to one another, with each concept working well in a very few cases but not in lots of others. For instance, Melissa Tammerijn looked pretty terrific in a set of lean, cobalt blue, geometric-print pants; that was the first and last time Smith had a hit with the blue print. Yet his success quote [url=http://www.ncgvg.com/c-24_42_64.html]その他[/url] was way higher considering the same print in fiery red: It came off well within a short, fitted minidress, and made for any high-impact bonded lining to a mannish black overcoat. You had to speculate: What was going upon here? The same logic, or lack thereof, applied to the fluttery element on numerous silk blouses, and to the vivid looks embossed with architectural surroundings. It was interesting to find out Smith experiment with specialised materials and new offline processes and silhouettes, and some of his architectural pieces had numerous charm. But as a total, they didn't seem to suit into the Paul Smith idiom whatsoever.[url=http://www.carolijabg.com/c-22.html]JORDAN 5[/url] Naturally, Smith was on firmer ground with his menswear-inspired tailoring. There were two essential trouser silhouettes this year: a cropped, tapered pant with numerous volume, and a short shape that has been slouchier and more boyish. Neither was particularly progressive, but they worked very well to ground the appears. Meanwhile, Smith's confidence with colour really came through inside his tailoring, as he refreshed comparable ensembles by recombining colorations in various painterly ways. The collection's other durability was its outerwear, especially the oversize deep blue shearling motorcycle jacket by using electric blue trim as well as the abbreviated, boxy peacoat in white-colored and navy. Amid all the experimental [url=http://www.juliealles.net/c-182_198_216.html]アクセサリ[/url] pyrotechnics here, it was the moderate look that matched the peacoat with a couple bright blue boyish trousers that stress the biggest bang for dinner. It's tempting to call that weird, but as a make a difference of fact, it's not.What’s in a prefix? The non- of non-philosophy, as Anthony frequently reminds you, is the same because the non- of non-Euclidean geometry or maybe the non- of non-standard physics. Indeed, Laruelle, it seems, has taken to mentioning this as non-standard philosophy rather than simply non-philosophy. The non- is definitely not, therefore, an anti- or a great un-, it does not symbolize either an oppositional discourse, or a mark of being outside as well as other. In the same method that non-Euclidean geometry continues to geometry, or that people taking care of non-standard physics still observe themselves as physicists.

스팸 신고 스팸 해제

댓글 수정

비밀번호

수정 취소

/ byte

댓글 입력

이름 비밀번호 관리자답변보기

확인

/ byte


* 왼쪽의 문자를 공백없이 입력하세요.(대소문자구분)

에게만 댓글 작성 권한이 있습니다.